The old adage goes, “A picture is worth a thousand words,” and for the 2008 presidential election the phrase could not ring truer. Images spanning the globe have frozen in time the immense joy and pride that many have felt at seeing Barack Obama become our nation’s first African-American President-elect – and regardless of one’s political affinity, no one can deny the tremendous historical nature of this election.
Indeed, from neighborhoods across America to the global community, people are energized by the possibilities which a new administration might offer. On the heels of an election that was often touted for its historic significance for women – a constituency that voted 56% in his favor on November 4th– the Obama administration would be wise to build on that momentum by addressing the struggling status for women in the U.S.
Despite the rise of women as political contenders and voters in the 2008 election season, the U.S. is woefully behind other nations in terms of parity in representation. Over the last decade, the United States has fallen from 47th in the world in women’s political representation to 71st – behind such stalwarts of democracy as Iraq (33rd), Sudan (65th) and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (57th). Only weeks ago, Rwanda made global history when it became the first nation electing women to outnumber men in parliament.
Yet for all the advances that women are making on the global front, women’s political participation here in the U.S. is lagging far behind the times.
Even in this election, where more women ran for congress than ever before in a presidential year, the net gain for women candidates was a mere four seats – one in the Senate and three in the House. We raised the percentage of women in Congress from a meager 16% to an equally paltry 17%, assuring that the U.S. would continue to lag woefully behind other countries in the numbers of women in national political leadership.
Historically, women have been the “government in exile” – leading at the foot of the table as a marginalized constituency. Yet to address the myriad of issues which confront women – from poverty and domestic violence to healthcare and work-life balance – women must be represented in the upper echelons of government where such issues are tackled and policy is enacted. Instead of addressing these issues in an inefficient and piecemeal fashion, a Presidential Commission on Women and Democracy would present the new administration with a vehicle to enact permanent and systemic change: by finding ways to have a more women at the tables of power at all levels, and fostering a truly representative democracy.
A diverse and critical mass of women in leadership – not to replace men, but to lead alongside them – would allow both genders to contribute new ways of dealing with the most difficult challenges our country has faced in this century. Programs such as The White House Project’s Vote, Run, Lead have been critical to getting more women to enter the political pipeline, by equipping them with the inspiration, information, and necessary tools to run for elected office and win. Yet academic researchers have demonstrated that achieving a critical mass of women in politics requires an equal effort from governments – which is why The White House Project is spearheading the effort to urge the next administration to create this Commission.
The Presidential Commission on Women and Democracy would utilize leading academic and experiential methodologies to reverse our nation’s dismal lag in gender parity. Members of the commission would be carefully appointed from a variety of sectors to bring a full range of nonpartisan domestic and international approaches, setting achievable goals by way of practical methods. Possible strategies might include: priority voting and other democracy reforms which result in wins by outsider candidates; guaranteed campaign loan funds; civil society curriculum in schools; increased training for women candidates; increased support from central party leadership for women candidates; and popular culture initiatives.
With the unprecedented popular momentum towards bipartisanship, civic engagement, and deep-seated political change, now is the time to move women from the “government in exile” to the “government in power.” The prospect of an Obama administration which is open and appreciative of this effort is high; now is the time to capitalize on the opportunity. In a campaign whose rallying cry was “change”, shifting the status of women in this country by bringing them fully to the tables of power would be a great place to start.
November 6, 2008 at 5:59 pm
Wouldn ‘t it be more effective now to pass legislation ensuring that women get equal pay for equal work?
November 6, 2008 at 6:13 pm
I think this is an excellent start. WomenCount.org is also advocating for a Presidential Commission on Women.
But I am concerned as I read about early cabinet possibilities that there are no women on the list for prominent cabinet posts. This is very disheartening. Should we also be advocating for President-elect Obama to ensure that women and minorities are visibly represented in his cabinet and administration?
November 6, 2008 at 6:30 pm
In June when the White House Project, American Express and O Magazine collaborated to bring 80 women to New York City for leadership “Women Rule” training, it is a sure bet that the networks and enthusiasm these women brought with them to this very special initiative caught fire and we all became infused wih passion to help campaigners from all parties to run for office, to look inside their own souls and recognize their own abilities to run, to work to increase the numbers of women , young people and others that came out to vote and created one of America’s most historic events in all of history. I was one of those selectees and I believe one of the “elders” who not only echoe Marie Wilson’s words “A picture is worth a thousand words”, and not only because of the incredible photographs that have flooded through media outlets, but in the minds and hearts of so many who have been counting on “HOPE” for change.
Our Art Miles team would like to offer that picture, a whole mile or 440 murals from The Art Miles Mural Project as a tool to promote, recognize, encourage, inspire and call to action all people who recognize that these pictures and this kind of action truly does have the power of art to educate and move people, and has touched the lives of over 1/2 million people as of this writing, including women young and old. Why not have a “visual documentation of modern history” at our fingertips to promote change and “illustrate” the voices of women, not only in the USA, but everywhere? And this project is not just about murals, but the process and the content of the murals that are also produced and portrayed through multi media and including, YES, the use of holograms to be used for events and promoting all 12 of our social networking issues.
As I write this from Egypt where we are working on negotiating arrangements to build that 4th pyramid (yes, a woman is trying to do that) as mentioned in the November issue of “O” Magazine, I have been amazed and overjoyed at the reaction by people here to our election. Today’s election read “Obama wins election and is the 5th President elected during Mubareks term of office so far”…. translating to how even here in the Middle East, people respect and understand and admire our American ability to exercise our right to vote and further to put forth women candidates for office as we have witnessed with both Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sarah Paln. Young women have discussed this, as if it is a miracle.
But when I tell them that the statistics still lag, as discussed above as well, they only grow more curious. And that tells me that the sleeping giant is about to awaken. I support Marie’s initiative for a Women’s Commission with my whole heart and soul, and perhaps by doing so, we really can help prepare our country to take their rightful place in our society, not only in pictures but in reality at the decision and leadership positions we so rightfully deserve. Hundreds of women refugees from Africa, Chechnya, Bosnia, Kosovo, and other parts of the world have painted murals that reveal what is in their hearts–even women escaping from former Taliban painted in secret behind closed doors to express their need and love for literature and culture and the arts and a place inside and outside the home. So whether we women write it, say it, paint it, act it out, or take on progressive role and/or prepare ourselves and If “Change” is really not in the offing, but on the front steps of the new administration, then let Marie Wilson and the White House Project be the genesis, the enigma, the spark, the roaring fire that propels our government and our country’s people into positive pro action and equality. Let’s work together to be the change we want to be and follow the leadership and footsteps of HOPE that we have witnessed through the White House Projects actions that truly show that a picture is worth a thousand words. Let’s get our women elected and let us do it with the synergy and rebirth of energy and hope we have only begun to experience.
November 6, 2008 at 6:38 pm
I think it is an excellent idea to appoint a Presidential Commission [on Women and Democracy]. However, I would like the Commission to include – — Women, Children and the Preservation of Families in a Democracy. I think we need to think more comprehensive in terms of the work ahead for women. Our role is not contained to ourselves but to a greater responsibility – collective life. To this extent, I personally would like to see the Commission work towards more global issues, not just expansive in definition, but also inclusive of women of our ally countries. I believe that we as women have more in common than what separates us geographically. As the U.S. is 70 on the list of women in responsible political life, I think we have much to learn from our sisters in the global political forum.
November 6, 2008 at 6:58 pm
With due respect to the idea of a Presidential Commission on Women and Democracy, it’s my view that we have plenty of women’s groups already, plenty of studies on the benefits of women to government and business. What we need to ask President Obama to do is to appoint a parity cabinet. Michele Bachelet did it in Chile. Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf wanted to do it in Liberia, she just couldn’t find enough educated women. Well, we have plenty of educated enough women in the U.S. Let’s ask our president to appoint them, to make visible to everyone a committment to including women’s voices in equal measure at the highest levels of government.
November 6, 2008 at 7:27 pm
I htink it is critical that any official body of women be truly representative of the spectrum of women in terms of geography, education, age, economic level, ethnic group, political stance, history of advocacy for women. Too often women of the country are represented by the eastern elite. As the incredible acceptance of Sarah Palin demonstrated, there is a whole world of women in the country who do not relate to the usual spokespersons and who have diverse and valid ideas abut the needs of women.
Women can be very powerful when they unite around economic issues. It would be wise to choose one topic to rally around rather than having a long list of issues. Priorities have to be set and honored. Women’s voices are often so fractured that they lose the power of concentrated effort on one/two critical issues each year.
Another event like Bejing, American style, would be a great start. Maybe 100,000 with a three day agenda and careful preparation and media coverage. We are still the invisible ones. Moving from 16-17% is ridiculous. American women are always startled to realize how backward we are.
Speakers would be able to come from around the world and educate American women in the need for women in leadership. The NEED, not just for equity, but because we are in danger of more violence when only men have real political power.
best wishes, Marie. Onward!
Alene
November 6, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Marie Wilson needs to call CNN and tell them to diversify the prospective Obama cabinet appointments to include women and non-white men!
November 6, 2008 at 8:50 pm
Marie Wilson needs to call CNN and tell them to diversify their prospective Obama cabinet prospect to include something besides white men! No doubt she could supply them with some top notch women to include in their prognosticating.
November 6, 2008 at 9:42 pm
While McCain was willing to put a female Vice-President on his ticket, President-Elect Obama and Vice-President-Elect Biden likely will not find a woman worthy of even a cabinet position or any other executive or administrative position.. I predict more of the same old song from these two males (regardless of the fact that one of them happens to be a minority) and do not see much progress or change happening when it comes to women even during this administration.. I always knew that I would see an African-American president before I saw a woman as Vice-President, let alone President.. rather than trying to convince the old-boys club to let women in and let their voices be heard, we need to push our way in, break the boundaries ourselves, and scream from the top of our lungs that our voices deserve to be heard!! We must fill the political pipelines from the bottom-up.. locally, state-wide and nationally.. if it means running for school boards, city councils, mayor, board of county commissioners, governor, state house, etc. we need to give women the experience and the means to climb the ladder to the Presidency.. lets stop talking about how we will do it, or how we will convince the men to let us in.. lets do it!!
November 6, 2008 at 10:10 pm
A commission on Women and Democracy is a good idea. However, it needs to take a strong stand against the trashing and exploitation of feminism and feminists. And the women who lead the commission must be “out of the closet” feminists. It is so cowardly for a woman to say, “I don’t like labels” when someone asks if she is a feminist. I couldn’t respect her as a leader.
We feminists need to tell Obama to apologize for his sexist language (i.e., you guys, mankind, your fellow man) and follow the lead of Chile’s Michele Bachelet and Spain’s Luis Zapatero and ensure that 50% of his Cabinet members are feminist women. We feminists need to tell Obama to avoid hiring men who have stay-at-home wives, and we need to tell him to have a Presidential Commission on Misogyny. Among other things, this commission would follow the lead of Spanish feminists and sponsor public service ads that admonish men to take equal responsibility for housework and childcare.
November 6, 2008 at 11:03 pm
I am truly heart broken that a women did not make it to the White House this year. I could not believe my ears when I heard that another women was voting for a man over a women in this race to the White House. Everyone is talking about how historical it is that an African American is president, and it is; but it leaves me with one question and that is where does that leave women. Some how in this race it became more important for an African American man to make it to the White House over a women. I could just be very bias about this election, but I truly saw a lack in confidence amoung our fellow women voters. I would not even state such comments if there was not a qualified female running for president, but there was a very qualified women running. Barack Obama should give Hillary Clinton a high position for all of her and her husbands support in his campaigne after she finally lost to him. Also, putting all political parties aside we have yet another female bashing in the media frenzy attacking Sarah Palin. Women of America wake up and see that we are being attacked in this country all the time. In the work place, on the television, the internet, and by ourselves. We have to get past these stereo types and realize that we still have a long way to go before we accomplish equality. We can not sit back and accept this treatment any longer. We need a voice. We have to be heard. We cry for women all over the world when we need to cry for ourselves. Take a stand for freedom from comformity. It’s time to show this country what women can do.
November 7, 2008 at 1:58 am
We all know the truth of the democratic primary results. Hillary won the popular vote. Neither candidate won enough pledged delegates in order to pass the finish line on June 6, the superdelegates cast their vote or changed the pledge on that day, and put Obama over the finish line on June 6. But Hillary may well had more pledged delegates than Obama on the final primary day, if Michigan and Florida pledged delegates could have counted. The fact the the states broke DNC rules is absolutely irrelevant. The states hold and fund primary and general elections. Those states were controlled by Republicans. The Republicans did not care one iota whether or not they are playing by the stupid DNC rules. So, the votes in those states should have been taken into consideration on June 6. No doubt Hillary would have had more pledged delegates and deserving of the superdelegates sticking with their position from the beginning and resulting in more delegates (both pledged and super) and her becoming the party nominee. It’s amazing how twisted up our system gets, to the point that no one understands all the manipulation. Again, in the end Hillary had the popular vote and certainly, would have come out ahead if the pledged delegates would have been taken into consideration before all the superdelegates threw their votes Obama’s way. So after the contraversial primary and the superdelegate love fest with Obama, he screws her out of the VP running mate position and then all we can hear about for the rest of the campaing is whining that Hillary won’t campaign hard enough for the man that just screwed and pissed on her! Now, if that isn’t a classic case of misogny and male abuse against women, then nothing is. God almighty, when will the women of this world wake up? It saddens me, that I know way too many women that “wouldn’t vote for Hillary because they didn’t think a woman could win” but had no problem casting a vote for almost any other candidate that represented the same views. There’s a lot of people and generations that have fought for everything they have, lot of people that have never given up and made this country what it is, Obama rode in and reaped all the benefits effortlessly, let’s hope he doesn’t forget all those that have gone before him, all the women that have put up with all the shit including his own shitting on Hillary during this campagin, let’s all have hope that we deserve what we voted for. We cast our votes for the ALL THE WOMEN OF THIS COUNTRY, for the families they held together, and for the country they will continue to hold together. That’s the HOPE we have for our tomorrow. iT’S OUR TURN NOW.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/D.phtml
November 7, 2008 at 2:11 am
This organization is a joke! Touche Jennifer…………we had a chance to put a woman in the top position of the greatest country in the world and look what this organization, with all its members did……….fell for the charismatic typical, anthony robbins motivational speaker. Im a Republican and was willing to vote democratic for Hillary, prior to Sarah Palin arriving on the scene. You women are too critical of other women and where is your initiative to let the media know that you oppose all their bashing? Where were the women from this network? Its impossible to find a candidate that will support all your issues. But a female, who walks your shoes can certainly relate to our issues. You know, keep playing in your little organizations……that’s as far as you will get. Enjoy your little tea parties. That’s just where the media and in particular, men, want to see you. And now to ask Obama who still isnt sworn in to form a Female Commision………..come on…..u cant be serious!!!
And keep in mind Obama did not win by a landslide. This organization should have taken its donations and produced a 30 minute infomercial just like obama and demanded more from the insensitive media in relation to women, and all the other issues we wanted to cover relating to women in Office. Im sure other women groups would have supported you financially as well and probably could have received government funding too!
November 7, 2008 at 2:12 am
No doubt, if the situation was reversed and had the superdelegates put Hillary over the top and/or if Hillary had not put Obama on the ticket as VP running mate, the African American would have cried DISCRIMINATION. Oh my God, it’s DISCRIMINATION again in America. Oh my God, Hillary is a bitch and a witch. God, really, what’s the deal? Hillary, is a martyr, ONCE AGAIN, the woman supports her democratic man without WHINING. Can Hillary work hard enough once again to support her man even when he shits on her? Certainly. Why? Because women are GODDESSES and always have been. We are hear to help men understand that this world is just NOT ALL ABOUT THEM. When that day comes, they easily will understand that men look better and feel better and live better, when they really learn how to honor and trust and love their wives and the women in this world. And that day, is coming, John McCain has seized the day. Hat’s off to John McCain. He never looked so good with Sarah Palin at his side. Finally, a man we can trust. Let’s hope the rest of the world wakes up and realizes that same potential WE ALL HAVE AND ARE WILLING TO SHARE if only given a chance.
November 7, 2008 at 2:14 am
This organization is a joke! Touche Jennifer…………we had a chance to put a woman in the top position of the greatest country in the world and look what this organization, with all its members did……….fell for the charismatic typical, anthony robbins motivational speaker. Im a Republican and was willing to vote democratic for Hillary, prior to Sarah Palin arriving on the scene. You women are too critical of other women and where is your initiative to let the media know that you oppose all their bashing? Where were the women from this network? Its impossible to find a candidate that will support all your issues. But a female, who walks your shoes can certainly relate to our issues. You know, keep playing in your little organizations……that’s as far as you will get. Enjoy your little tea parties. That’s just where the media and in particular, men, want to see you. And now to ask Obama who still isnt sworn in to form a Female Commision………..come on…..u cant be serious!!!
And keep in mind Obama did not win by a landslide. This organization should have taken its donations and produced a 30 minute infomercial just like obama and demanded more from the insensitive media in relation to women, and all the other issues we wanted to cover relating to women in Office. Im sure other women groups would have supported you financially as well, and probably could have received government funding too!
November 7, 2008 at 4:08 am
Kathleen — I totally agree with this. We really need to hold him accountable, especially since it is women – across ages, incomes, races, geography, and ages – that put him in the White House. (See http://www.iwpr.org) I’ve already gone to his transition web site (www.change.gov) to post my thoughts on what he can do immediately: appoint women and minorities to one-half of his cabinet posts; appoint a Presidential Commission; and adopt NWLC’s Platform for Progress. I intend to stay on his butt on this, and I am writing/posting everywhere I can for other women to do the same! I hope you will, too!
November 7, 2008 at 5:26 am
This was an election that produced change. It is one step at a time. This is not just about a black man becoming a president. It is about the country not stacking the ballots so he could not, it is about people not steretyping him into a mold to fit any one culture. It is about young people taking an interest in the country’s interest and much more.
Susan from MN-discrimination comes in all forms. And you are sounding like you are participating and filtering an active role in this discrimination by your statements. Your remark alone makes one to believe that you would not give a black man a chance based on his coor. Just to let you know, not all blacks cry discrimination on the onset, many blacks are brought up not to belive they are being discriminated in order for them to move forward and fulfill there dreams, sometime they have to work doubly hard. Just has people was not voting for or against Obama because he was a black man, the same was going against Hillary because she was a women. Why would Sara Palin have been considered any differently, especially when she could not have ever matched up to Hillary and personally she could not have never represented me as a woman. The election is over and the decison is made. President Elect Obama has clearly asked the American people to help, even if you did not vote for him. I think by providing recommendations to him to assure that voices from a good core of diverse women are heard through a commission is great plus to remind him to be mindful of the sexist language. I think this is the first step we can help him to put forth the change that we are asking for and that he is promising. I also agree with Kathleen to flood the web site, early on.
November 7, 2008 at 6:04 am
I am so proud that Obama has won the election, although I was a bit hopeful that he would pick a woman for VP. I want to know on some small level how I can encourage my 6 year old daughter to be a leader and use her confidence to make a difference in the world. My own Mother has encouraged me while I pursue my PhD, but it is in a traditionally female career, psychotherapy. While I am proud of this, I want to do more with these credentials…and give both my children the tools they need to step up and give in a positive way to other children in need. When will you host another White House Project with Oprah? I so wanted to get my idea into action and hear Marie Wilson speak!
thanks,
vicki
November 7, 2008 at 8:33 am
Perhaps you should target Michelle OBama for this. She is a strong, smart and passionate women who has had a life in her own right. I have no doubt she will not be a shrinking violet in the background.
November 7, 2008 at 9:02 am
It is with great joy that I write to ask our first Black president to “give-back” to the women of the United States. Give-back to those women that have canvassed, called, talked, supported, rallied, marched, served, debated, gathered, organizied, reassembled, traveled, renewed, emailed, phone banked, spread the word, spread phamphlets … oh and then there is fed, clothed, cleanup behind and added our voiced support to his campaign. Please, Mr. President create a Commission on Women … Please Mr. President appoint educated and qualified “women” to your cabinet and staff … Please Mr. President support us, as we have supported both you and the Black race since the 1960″s. Please Mr. President?
November 7, 2008 at 10:02 am
Who thinks that BO will do anything for women or any hard working American for that matter,,,,,, he is self serving. Read his wife’s thesis…… God help America….
November 7, 2008 at 10:39 am
Senator Obama can begin by hiring more senior women on his staff and in his cabinet. Considering he had the fewest number of upper tiered woman on his campaign staff of all of the primary presidential candidates, he’s due for a major shift. It was reason enough for me to support Hillary in the primaries!! In his speeches he’s emphasized how women have influenced his life and played a major role in his successes. Well now he needs to start walking the walking and not just talking the talk. And yes, I voted for him for president.
Karin
Houston
November 7, 2008 at 11:16 am
I don’t think that we need to judge or blame Barack Obama for anything. He had a goal to become president and he accomplished that goal. He hasn’t even made it to the White House yet, and here we are attacking our president for an issue that has been going on for a long time. Women came very close to being in the White House this year, and it didn’t happen for whatever reason. Obama has a lot of big issues to deal with as president, and we need him to be able to deal with our economy and enviroment and the war. We need to think of this as a step forward, and we need to believe that it will be our turn next. We need to hold strong and not waste our energy fighting against one person, but to focus on informing women on where we stand and where we want to be.
November 7, 2008 at 11:19 am
Priority voting as a step towards a more democratic society? What, exactly, is priority voting? Do I sense an oxymoron lurking there, somewhere?
November 7, 2008 at 10:43 pm
A Commission is not a bad idea. But, I would like to put forth perhaps a more radical idea. How many thousands of well- educated women and young women from high school and college volunteer in campaigns to help men be elected every election?? Women should just decide to turn this energy and commitment to volunteering only for women and funding and assisting them. I would bet you that the mass removal of ourselves from supporting male candidates would bring some immediate attention not only to the voting power of women but to how much they have helped men get ahead.
Perhaps then, even the men might might suddenly find that they could assist women in attaining both equality under the law, but also parity. I am not a young woman and I have worked in many campaigns. Except for young male students and hired campaigners the majority of volunteers have been women. Women wake up and realize your power. Think out of the box we’ve been locked in. We get the same old thing because we do the same old thing. Let’s find new ways to shake up the old boys network and rattle our real power.
November 8, 2008 at 12:25 pm
At the start of the primary season, John McCain employed more women than men in his Senate office. Barak Obama employed more men than women. McCain’s women staffers averaged higher pay than the men, Obama’s women staffers averaged lower pay than the men. McCain had the courage to high a female leader whose life has been a succession of breaking through glass ceilings. Obama passed over the most recognizeable woman in his party and to whom he had lost the majority of regular delegate votes to settle for a 29-year-member of the good old boys club. The choice this year was walk the walk versus talk the talk. In the interest of full disclosure, I am a male, Republican feminist who did not support John McCain in the Iowa caucus. Still, as to casting a vote in favor of where women want to be in this country and supporting the ticket that would best serve to get us there, it was a crystal clear choice. Too bad we’ll now have to wait four more years. Let’s hope that the abortion on demand issue doesn’t trump pragmatic politics. Again.
November 14, 2008 at 6:11 pm
A presidential commission to review current responsibilities and rights of both women and men in our democracy is an excellent idea. I suggest that as a first order of business, the commission propose the law that provides for a single sex draft be revised to include women. An important step for women to make on the way to sitting at the table of power is to accept full responsibility for protecting the freedom we enjoy. As long as men can say that they can be obliged to fight (drafted into military service) to protect our freedom while women cannot be obliged to fight, we are beholden to them.
Can we be fully invested in defending our freedom? Yes, we can.
In the past women have had to fight for the right to even volunteer for military service. And fight we have, in every war and conflict in which our Nation has been involved. Currently women are volunteering for military service in increasing numbers. However, currently only our young men are required by law to register for the selective service (draft).
Can we stand side-by-side with our male citizens in defending freedom? Yes, we can.
When members of the general public are asked if women are “allowed” in combat, they will probably answer, “Yes,” and they will be 100% correct when referring to air-to-air combat. However, when referring to direct combat on the ground – the kind of combat that involves seeking out an enemy on the ground to kill that enemy using tactics, techniques and procedures learned for that specific objective – women are by current policy in the U.S.A. excluded.
Can we see that this policy is confusing not only to those who serve in the military, but also to those who support our men and women in uniform? Yes, we can.
Presented as if they are indisputable facts are some objections raised against women serving in direct ground combat units. First on the list: Women don’t have the strength necessary.
Can we find women capable of doing all the physical tasks necessary to be awarded the military occupational specialty of Infantry? Yes, we can.
Being full citizens of the United States of America involves shouldering responsibilities to ensure rights. Today, men can say, “We ensure the rights of women.”
Can women share fully that responsibility; can we act with full knowledge of what it means to be required to answer our Nation’s call in time of emergency? Yes, we can.
When we remove the difference in responsibility that currently exists between men and women regarding compulsory military service in time of national emergency, we will be able to take our places at the table of power knowing we have the right to be there.
November 16, 2008 at 11:37 am
I was a Girl Scout for ten years, achieved the highest rank possible at the time and have been a proud Scout my entire life. I am appauled by the comments on this site. To think my niece, a Daisy, may have access to this partisan chatter is over the top! The White House Project is about nonpartisan and national woman’s leadership, not discussion about abortion, pro choice, etc. Instead of looking at Palin or Hillary as the anti Christs (whomever you hate most) let us look at the fact that we had a woman running for president, and vp. This is a huge step for our country and for my “Daisy”. When I was a scout, I learned more about the world, the outdoors and activities that I would never had access to in my family. Lets leave the political chatter for an adult blog and not for our scouts to read. This is not the place for it.
January 24, 2009 at 3:42 am
Thank the good Lord and hearty women from yester-year that ‘she may have access to the chatter’ here.
When I was a girl and wanted to be a firefighter, my uncle tapped me on the head and with love in his eyes and said “Oh no no no sweetheart, you musn’t think of such things. There are chores to do and the food doesn’t cook itself, women have a place working with fire… but that place is in the kitchen.”
As we raise our children right, no words she/he hears that are contrary to their own thought procesess will have power over them. My guess is as a ‘daisy’, her age would not really allow her to understand abortion, stem-cell research, the anti-christ or politics. In fact there are many women (and men) activists, that would say they ARE leaders in the field of the hot-button issues like those mentioned above. Whether you or any disagee, the value of their endeavors remains. A woman like Florynce R. Kennedy provides a very good example of my point.
I have 8 children of my own creation (5 girls 3 boys), and believe that information, communication and contemplation are 3 keys to dealing with political views/issues and kids. The truth (separate of dogma and doctine) sets us all free in the end.
As to this WHP, hmmm? I don’t know. I have high hopes it will be something, more than just a thought. A real hope that help is there for those that need it and deserve it… that would be a step in the evolution of the common woman.
My question is, who will be included and who excluded?
Over 1 in 2 women are single mothers, most with mulitple children. 1 in 4, likely has a non-violent felony conviction. Many of us are abused, carless and/or homeless with bad or no credit at all. There are a great many that are too young or too old to be in positions of power, and far too few of us are Columbia, Stanford or Harvard educated or even HS educated.
Will this progam seek to advance only the top of the heap? — as is the ‘norm’. Or will we break out shovels to bring daylight to the buried and forgotten? My guess is that this is an idea who’s greatness will likely be lost on the majority of us…I pray and hope I am wrong.
Please Mr. President, be all you have promised you would be.
March 26, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Jewel – You make very good points. This movement has to encompass ALL women – not just the successful and educated. I think the president we have will be what he promised to be!
March 27, 2009 at 2:51 pm
I think we have to agree that so far, President Obama has kept to his promises. The rest is up to us!
March 29, 2009 at 1:18 pm
I think that our president has already shown that he reaches out to ALL and that his approach is one of fairness and recognition of all segments of our society. No longer will the healthy and wealthy have preferential government treatment.