Call for Action


February 12, 2010

By Robyn Gordon

At 25, Lindsay Van is considered the best female ski-jumper in the world.  During the International Ski Federation’s Nordic Ski Championships 2009 held in February and March 2009, women’s ski jumping made its sporting debut, and Van was the first North American to medal in ski jumping and the first American to win gold at the championships.  However, despite Van’s status as holding the record (for both men and women) for the normal ski jumping hill at the site of the 2010 Winter Olympics, Van will not be able to compete as athletes gather today in Vancouver for the start of the Games.  While the Olympics hold three ski jumping events, they have always been restricted to men, who have been invited to compete since 1924.  This past November, Van led a group of 14 women ski jumpers in a lawsuit against the Olympic Organizing Committee, suing the IOC for discrimination against them by excluding female ski jumpers while allowing men to compete.  Three British Columbia Courts of Appeal judges unanimously dismissed the lawsuit, asserting that the courts had no jurisdiction over the IOC, which had made the decision to exclude women.

Even more shockingly, Gian Franco Kasper, the President of the International Ski Federation, expressed reluctance to allow women to compete at the Nordic Ski Championships a year before they were held, as he was concerned about the health issues for women.  He explained, “It’s like jumping down from two meters on the ground about a thousand times a year, which seem not to be appropriate for ladies from a medical point of view.”

Alissa Johnson, a world-ranked women’s ski jumper, revealed to MSNBC that it is frustrating and difficult to be taken seriously in a sport that she and a dozen of her teammates have spent their whole lives developing and improving without participation in the Olympics.  Yet the IOC maintainted that it made its decision to exclude women’s ski jumping strictly on a technical basis and not on gender bounds.

In another blow to US women’s ski jumping, the US Ski and Snowboard Association announced that it would drop the American team because it cannot afford to support athletes that aren’t going to the Olympics.

While Olympic CEO John Furlong maintained that “there is a very good chance that [women ski jumpers] are going to get included in the program in the future,” Johnson and Van declare that the IOC insisted the same thing after the 2002 and 2006 Olympics.  “It’s like a broken record, and we’re tired of hearing empty promises,” they said.

Van fears this may mark the end of her career, that it may be time to move on, for without the Olympics or sponsors, many athletes become frustrated and quit.  She cares more about the sport moving forward, and hopefully, for young athletes such as 15-year old Sarah Hendrickson, women’s ski jumping will appear on the roster for the 2014 Olympics in Sochi, Russia.  Hendrickson affirmed, “I’m just going to keep jumping and loving it.  We just have to keep going and keep trying for the people behind us.”

By Robyn Gordon

This week, Senator Al Franken (D-MN) introduced the Compassionate Care for Servicewomen Act, co-sponsored by Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME).  This legislation would require that emergency contraception, also know as Plan B or the “morning-after” pill, be carried at every military healthcare facility.  Senator Franken explained in his introduction to the bill that while emergency contraception is more widely available to women serving on domestic posts, it is less accessible to women stationed overseas.  Senator Franken has a history of standing up for women who work for the Defense Department.  In October 2009 he sponsored an amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations bill that would have given female military contractors access to the criminal justice system for cases of sexual assault, battery, and discrimination.

Currently, about 350,000 women serve in the American military, yet military bases are not required to stock emergency contraception, which can prevent pregnancy after sex.  The Compassionate Care for Servicewomen Act would require that military pharmacists offer emergency contraception to servicewomen without a prescription, just as anyone over the age of seventeen in the United States can obtain this form of birth control without a prescription as allowed by the Food and Drug Administration.  Presently, military servicewomen face inconsistent access to emergency birth control, even while they can be threatened with courts martial should their primary form of birth control fail, should they become victims of sexual abuse, or should they fail to use contraception and consequently become pregnant.  Additionally, military facilities are not allowed to perform abortions under federal law.

Senator Franken’s Compassionate Care for Servicewomen Act would likely be examined as an amendment to the defense authorization bill, as his amendment to the appropriations bill was in October.  In the meantime, please urge your Congressperson to support the Compassionate Care for Servicewomen Act to ensure that emergency contraception is available to women at every military base!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.